Released 30/03/2010
It's hard to know exactly how to feel about the latest DCSF announcement about "organised" school visits to share best practice.
On the one hand, I'm a big believer that co-operation, collaboration and sharing knowledge will be increasingly important for schools in the coming years. Equally, it's good to see a concrete programme which supports the government's earlier pledge to encourage better partnerships, federations and schools linking to drive up standards (from their white paper Your child, your schools, our future: building a 21st century schools system).
On the other, do schools really need a "professionally managed" visit to help them share with other organisations? Last week, I attended a meeting of the Worcester Association of School Business Managers where 25 able professionals shared best practice, information and discussion with not a hint of DCSF support.
Surely the introduction of a pilot, management support, stakeholder consultation and a new website add costs which the DCSF can little afford? Why not just give more money to schools so they can afford to employ a few more staff and free leaders to undertake this kind of visit with the time freed up?
I simplify, of course. It's good to see resources invested in something which is vital for schools, but I can't help but feel there is something slightly patronising about it all. Let's hope that this sense of paternalism and centralised management doesn't deter schools from taking part in a scheme which could just open up new avenues for collaboration as well as planting new ideas.
And one last thing - I do hope school business managers will be included in these managed visits, especially for the schools highlighted as delivering best value. I suspect they will be thanks to the government's recent focus on SBMs, but I just thought it worth mentioning in case any of the powers that be at the DCSF are reading....